The article suggests a reconstruction of Marx’s Critique of Political Economy as a macro-monetary theory of capitalist production. The irst part of what follows will provide a sort of methodological introduction to Das Kapital. I am questioning the meaning of critique versus criticism, the distinction between fetish-character and fetishism, the role of dialectics, and the diference between reading, interpretation and reconstruction. I will focus especially on Volume I. At the centre of the discussion are: the multiple meanings of abstract labour and socialization, the role of money as a commodity for the labour theory of value, the “method of comparison” in grounding valorisation (the emergence of gross proits) as the constitution of capital from class struggle in production, the unity of absolute and relative surplus value extraction, the key notion of «Technologie» in the real subsumption of labour to capital, the law of the tendential fall in relative wage, Marx’s two notions of «competition», and the macro-monetary class perspective in capitalist reproduction crucial to Capital, Volume I. Some considerations are devoted to the transformation problem, the so-called New Interpretation, and crisis theory.

C’è vita su Marx? “Il Capitale” nel bicentenario / Micaloni, Luca. - In: CONSECUTIO RERUM. - ISSN 2531-8934. - 5(2018), pp. 9-68.

C’è vita su Marx? “Il Capitale” nel bicentenario

Luca Micaloni
2018

Abstract

The article suggests a reconstruction of Marx’s Critique of Political Economy as a macro-monetary theory of capitalist production. The irst part of what follows will provide a sort of methodological introduction to Das Kapital. I am questioning the meaning of critique versus criticism, the distinction between fetish-character and fetishism, the role of dialectics, and the diference between reading, interpretation and reconstruction. I will focus especially on Volume I. At the centre of the discussion are: the multiple meanings of abstract labour and socialization, the role of money as a commodity for the labour theory of value, the “method of comparison” in grounding valorisation (the emergence of gross proits) as the constitution of capital from class struggle in production, the unity of absolute and relative surplus value extraction, the key notion of «Technologie» in the real subsumption of labour to capital, the law of the tendential fall in relative wage, Marx’s two notions of «competition», and the macro-monetary class perspective in capitalist reproduction crucial to Capital, Volume I. Some considerations are devoted to the transformation problem, the so-called New Interpretation, and crisis theory.
2018
abstract labour; method of comparison; real subsumption of labour to finance; tendential fall of the relative wage; competition; transformation problem; crisis theory
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01e Traduzione in rivista
C’è vita su Marx? “Il Capitale” nel bicentenario / Micaloni, Luca. - In: CONSECUTIO RERUM. - ISSN 2531-8934. - 5(2018), pp. 9-68.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1227344
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact